<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Abstraction on Thomas Cothran</title><link>https://thomascothran.tech/tags/abstraction/</link><description>Recent content in Abstraction on Thomas Cothran</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>2023, Thomas Cothran</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thomascothran.tech/tags/abstraction/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Wrong Kind of Readability</title><link>https://thomascothran.tech/2023/11/readability/</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thomascothran.tech/2023/11/readability/</guid><description>Andy Hunt and Dave Thomas tell us: &amp;#39;it’s critical that you write code that is readable and easy to reason about.&amp;#39; This seems uncontroversial; it is the rare point on which software engineers typically agree. Or do they?</description></item></channel></rss>